Transfer Pricing – CBDT signs 174 Advance Pricing Agreements (APAs) in FY 2024-25

CBDT has entered into 174 APAs with Indian taxpayers in FY 2024-25. These includes UAPAs, BAPAs and Multilateral APAs (MAPAs). With this, the total number of APAs since the inception of the programme has reached 815, comprising 615 UAPAs, 199 BAPAs and 1 MAPA. This marks the highest number of APAs signed in a single FY since the programme’s launch. Of the 174 APAs signed, 65 were BAPAs, the highest number of BAPAs finalized in any year so far. These were a result of Mutual Agreements with India’s treaty partners, including Australia, Japan, South Korea, Netherlands, New Zealand, Singapore, UK and the USA. CBDT has maintained a consistent pace in concluding APAs, having signed 125 in FY 2023-24 and 95 in FY 2022-23. Notably, this year also saw the signing of India’s first-ever MAPA. Additionally, on 27th March 2025 a record 34 APAs were signed on a single day

(Press Release issued by CBDT on 31st March, 2025)

Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 2025 (‘GSTAT Rules’)

Currently many litigations are going on. Many tax payers filed appeal before GST Commissioner (Appeal) which had been rejected. Now such tax payers are waiting for GST Appellate Tribunal to be operational so that they can file appeal and proceed further. Currently if any tax payer didn’t get favorable judgement by GST Commissioner (Appeal), then they have to wait for filing appeal because GST Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) is next authority where appeal can be filed against decision of Commissioner (Appeal).

Now, rules have been introduced for regulating the powers, procedures and functioning of GSTAT.

(Notification dated Apr 24, 2025)

ITC post cancellation of registration

In case of Solvi Enterprises Vs Additional Commissioner (GST) honourable Allahabad High Court made a judgement that the assessee cannot be held liable for the subsequent cancellation of the selling dealer’s registration, as all transactions were duly reflected in Form GSTR-2A at the time of claiming ITC. Consequently, the demand order issued under Section 74 of the CGST Act, 2017, has been set aside.   

Seizure of goods

In case of Zhuzoor Infratech Pvt Ltd Vs Additional Commissioner (GST) honorable Allahabad High Court made a judgement that technical error in shipping address on e-way bill cannot justify seizure or penalty when no discrepancy exists in quantity or quality of goods.

Appeal before Appellate Authority

Honorable Madras High Court made a judgement in case of DSM Soft Pvt Ltd Vs Additional Commissioner of GST (Appeal) that Crediting Electronic Cash Ledger with 10% of disputed tax constituted substantial compliance with pre-deposit requirement, despite non-generation of DRC-03 challan, which was merely a technical violation.

Parallel proceedings

Honourable Orissa High Court made a judgement in case of Bipin Kumar Agrawal that The Central GST authority cannot issue a show cause notice if the State authority has already initiated an audit and included the observations in the audit report, as the subject matter of both proceedings is the same.

Excellent Union Budget 2025 for MSME

Enhancement of credit availability with guarantee cover for MSMEs

Enterprise Credit Guarantee Cover
CurrentRevised
MSEsINR 5 CroreINR 10 Crore
StartupsINR 10 CroreINR 20 Crore
Exporter MSMEsFor term loans upto INR 20 Crore
Revision in classification criteria for MSMEs
Enterprise Investment Turnover
CurrentRevisedCurrentRevised
MicroINR 1 CroreINR 2.5 CroreINR 5 CroreINR 10 Crore
SmallINR 10 CroreINR 25 CroreINR 50 CroreINR 100 Crore
MediumINR 50 CroreINR 125 CroreINR 250 CroreINR 500 Crore

Blocking of ITC

Honourable Andhra Pradesh High Court made a judgement in case of Sugna Sponge & Power Pvt Ltd that Rule 86A of the CGST Rules, 2017, permits blocking ITC that was fraudulently availed, irrespective of whether it is currently available in electronic credit ledger. The term “such ITC” in Rule 86A refers to ITC availed wrongfully, not just ITC currently available in ledger.